[CPMD-list] Energy components in PIMD
Axel Kohlmeyer
akohlmey at cmm.chem.upenn.edu
Tue Apr 29 20:40:53 CET 2008
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, ukasz Walewski wrote:
LW> > so i would suggest you repeat the NVE tests (and NVT without
LW> > a thermostat on the electrons) with a DUAL of 6, 8 and 10
LW> > and see if that improves the situation and to what degree.
LW>
LW> Perhaps I can skip the NVE tests, since the runs I did already do not
LW> show any suspicious behavior (accidentally, as you said). What went
LW> wrong was the NVT run. What do you think ?
yep. i guess you are right.
it should not make a difference.
axel.
LW> > i would also do one test with norm conserving potentials to
LW> > see how they compare.
LW> >
LW> > good luck!
LW>
LW> Thanks a lot for this valuable discussion and suggestions.
LW>
LW> Kind regards,
LW> Lukasz
LW>
LW>
--
=======================================================================
Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey at cmm.chem.upenn.edu http://www.cmm.upenn.edu
Center for Molecular Modeling -- University of Pennsylvania
Department of Chemistry, 231 S.34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323
tel: 1-215-898-1582, fax: 1-215-573-6233, office-tel: 1-215-898-5425
=======================================================================
If you make something idiot-proof, the universe creates a better idiot.
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list