[CPMD-list] problem with geometry optimisation
Emmanuel Baribefe Naziga
baribefe at gmail.com
Fri May 11 09:48:36 CEST 2007
Hello Axel
I have done the geometry optimisation and obtained the following final results
**************************************************************
* *
* FINAL RESULTS *
* *
****************************************************************
ATOM COORDINATES GRADIENTS (-FORCES)
1 H 18.8879 12.6066 14.8312 -4.786E-05 -2.229E-05 2.609E-05
2 H 17.4666 9.8067 14.5485 -2.468E-06 -2.928E-05 -3.569E-06
3 H 17.6034 11.2216 17.3547 -5.036E-05 3.560E-05 4.115E-06
4 H 11.2896 9.6265 14.9325 4.172E-05 -1.669E-05 -1.885E-05
5 H 9.7498 12.3354 15.4114 3.589E-05 -5.686E-05 3.314E-06
6 H 11.4223 11.0315 17.7436 3.946E-05 4.702E-06 -1.954E-05
7 Cl 10.8589 16.2907 13.3979 -1.660E-05 -1.119E-05 2.582E-05
8 Cl 17.3053 16.4735 12.9767 3.754E-05 -2.063E-05 -3.876E-05
9 N 17.3982 11.5140 15.4542 -2.132E-05 5.240E-05 2.917E-05
10 N 11.3688 11.3352 15.8346 2.275E-06 4.079E-05 1.455E-05
11 Pt 14.2411 13.7600 14.4860 -4.926E-05 -4.932E-05 -7.458E-06
****************************************************************
ELECTRONIC GRADIENT:
MAX. COMPONENT = 6.23254E-07 NORM = 1.04314E-08
NUCLEAR GRADIENT:
MAX. COMPONENT = 5.68639E-05 NORM = 3.12780E-05
TOTAL INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC DENSITY
IN G-SPACE = 48.000000
IN R-SPACE = 48.000000
(K+E1+L+N+X) TOTAL ENERGY = -173.15051858 A.U.
(K) KINETIC ENERGY = 67.14626581 A.U.
(E1=A-S+R) ELECTROSTATIC ENERGY = -154.98121365 A.U.
(S) ESELF = 158.91200836 A.U.
(R) ESR = 1.71522917 A.U.
(L) LOCAL PSEUDOPOTENTIAL ENERGY = -73.56272067 A.U.
(N) N-L PSEUDOPOTENTIAL ENERGY = 12.69999593 A.U.
(X) EXCHANGE-CORRELATION ENERGY = -24.45284601 A.U.
GRADIENT CORRECTION ENERGY = -1.17235731 A.U.
However when I do a vibrational analysis, I get the following results
DIPOLE MOMENT
X Y Z TOTAL
0.22384 -3.56534 1.78097 3.99169 atomic units
0.56894 -9.06226 4.52681 10.14594 Debye
ITER= 78 ENERGY= -173.0822653701
TCPU= 3650.55 GRADIENT= 2.722E-04
****************************************************************
HARMONIC FREQUENCIES [cm**-1]:
-18.4797 -3.8125 12.2989 16.5519
22.5492 42.5310 115.3402 139.6681
143.0802 148.5352 160.3053 220.6020
227.1521 321.1464 331.3103 422.4017
435.7398 689.6132 704.9076 721.3247
748.1369 1198.9400 1205.0419 1575.1879
1581.4662 1602.2348 1608.2954 3221.7180
3222.3889 3354.3419 3354.6391 3400.8717
3401.1036
PURIFICATION OF DYNAMICAL MATRIX
****************************************************************
HARMONIC FREQUENCIES [cm**-1]:
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 114.2788 141.0731
145.4241 149.2187 158.8996 221.1149
225.7833 321.1145 331.2798 420.0770
431.6535 690.1473 705.3065 722.1001
748.5471 1201.5384 1206.6488 1575.4008
1581.9629 1602.4525 1608.6474 3221.9549
3222.3908 3354.4590 3355.0557 3400.9534
3401.5015
which is not very consistent with previous calculations particularly
around 500cm-1. Any ideas?
my input file is
&INFO
Cisplatin: Vibrational Spectra with finite differences
&END
&CPMD
VIBRATIONAL ANALYSIS FD GAUSS SAMPLE
2
RESTART WAVEFUNCTION COORDINATES LATEST
CONVERGENCE ORBITALS
1.0D-7
MAXSTEP
30000
STRUCTURE BONDS ANGLES DIHEDRALS
RESTFILE
3
STORE
1000
&END
&SYSTEM
POISSON SOLVER TUCKERMAN
ANGSTROM
SYMMETRY
0
CELL
15. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0.
CUTOFF
70.0
&END
&PROP
DIPOLE MOMENT
&END
&ATOMS
*H_MT_BLYP
LMAX=S
6
2.354418516159 0.019093690440 -0.064243108034
1.411824822426 -1.303389430046 -0.234962448478
1.443768382072 -0.502316892147 1.187707781792
-1.643410801888 -1.234962463379 -0.349684238434
-2.232093095779 -0.069135926664 0.630641579628
-0.998527586460 -1.013527393341 1.133388400078
*Cl_MT_BLYP.psp KLEINMAN-BYLANDER
LMAX=D
2
-1.733747005463 2.059042453766 -1.119829893112
1.383087396622 2.222492933273 -1.282287359238
*N_MT_BLYP KLEINMAN-BYLANDER
LMAX=P
2
1.485479116440 -0.403016984463 0.193374127150
-1.406602025032 -0.555594444275 0.344115614891
*PT_MT_GIA_BLYP KLEINMAN-BYLANDER
LMAX=D LOC=S
1
-0.064197830856 0.781314134598 -0.438224017620
&END
&DFT
NEWCODE
FUNCTIONAL BLYP
GC-CUTOFF
0.1E-05
&END
Thanks
Emmanuel
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list