[CPMD-list] some question on NOSE CAFES.
Tengfei Luo
luotengf at msu.edu
Mon Feb 26 05:59:13 CET 2007
Dear Apsi:
>Dear Tengfei,
> Adding a bit to Axel's answer:
> - If the MD does what you want, you could easily extract the temperatures
>of the sub-system with a small shell script employing e.g. perl, awk,
>python, ... to process the atomic velocities in the file 'TRAJECTORY' (32
>atoms per sub-system would be VERY small, but probably this is just a test
>for the feasibility of the approach anyway)
Yes, I'm testing if I can model the thermal transportation at materials
interface. I want to go to larger systems using QM/MM.
> - What is the highest phonon frequency in silicon? A time step of only 4
>atu sounds quite low for me, it's like the ones people use for water
>nowadays (and there the cut-off energy is usually 70-100 Ry plus the
>highest, stretching modes are at 2200-2400 cm^-1). This would also affect
>the frequency of the Nosé thermostat
I just wanted to start with safe parameters to test NOSE CAFES. Larger time
steps are OK when I used silicon for other purposes.
> - I would suggest you to check the sub-option 'SAMPLE' for 'TRAJECTORY'
>(unless you have lots of empty disc, anyway the output at each step is not
>necessary)
Yes, I really should always remember this:)
> - How did you obtain the values for 'NOSE ELECTRONS'? Did you optimise
>the target (0.00045 sounds a bit small, but maybe it is meaningful for a
>small system with such a low cut-off energy)
This is the value I got after I ran without thermostats.
> - 'PRINT FORCES ON', well please remember that during Car-Parrinello MD
>you are not exactly at the BO surface and you have to judge whether you
>can use the corresponding forces for some analysis; probably the deviation
>is small
I forgot to delete this!
> - I would doubt any calculation which uses 'LMAX=P' for silicon; maybe it
>IS okay, I'm just used to 'LMAX=D' for most of the elements (LOC=LMAX=D -
>the default - would be okay for silicon)
> - Like Axel said, that you get any temperature at all is a bit worrying -
>well, probably the thermostats do the job here, combined with a finite
>numerical precision
Yes, but why I don't need to specify an initial temperature when I used NOSE
IONS MASSIVE?
> Good luck! :)
> Greetings from the suburbs of Paris,
> apsi
>PS What is the purpose of the option 'RESTART ... RESTART'??
This is to retart from the geometry optimization.
Thank you for your patient email.
Tengfei
-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
Ari P Seitsonen / Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
IMPMC, CNRS & Université Pierre et Marie Curie
Tel: +33-1-4427 7542, Fax: +33-1-4427 3785, GSM: +33-6-6736 3820
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Tengfei Luo wrote:
>
> Here is my input file:
> &INFO
> 64 SI atoms half of which is nose to 100K, and the
> other half set to 200K
> &END
>
> &CPMD
> MOLECULAR DYNAMICS CP
> RESTART WAVEFUNCTION COORDINATES RESTART
> TRAJECTORY XYZ
> NOSE IONS CAFES
> 2
> 1 32 200.0 1500
> 33 64 100.0 1500
> NOSE ELECTRONS
> 0.00045 5000
> PRINT FORCES ON
> MAXSTEP
> 80000
> TIMESTEP
> 4.0
> STORE
> 5000
> &END
>
> &DFT
> FUNCTIONAL LDA
> &END
>
> &SYSTEM
> SYMMETRY
> 6
> SCALE S=2
> CELL
> 20.526204 1.0 1.0 0 0 0
> CUTOFF
> 20.0
> &END
>
> &ATOMS
> *SI_MT_LDA KLEINMAN-BYLANDER
> LMAX=P
> 64
> 0.50 1.00 0.50
> 1.00 0.50 0.50
> 0.50 0.50 0.00
> 1.00 1.00 0.00
> .......
> 1.25 1.25 1.25
> 1.25 1.75 1.75
> 1.75 1.75 1.25
> &END
>
> &BASIS
> PSEUDO AO 2
> 0 1
> &END
>
> Sorry for the long email! Any suggestion or advice would be greatly
> appreciated!
>
> Regards,
>
> T.Luo
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list