[CPMD-list] about oxygen Ultra-soft PP generated by USPP
qfzhang
qfzhang at aphy.iphy.ac.cn
Mon Apr 2 20:21:56 CEST 2007
Hi,
Thanks for the reply! the input file is attached here.I use MESH and DUAL, an
d calculate a charged system. Is there some other keyword that should be specifi
ed?
I have tried to add l=2 to generate O US-PP.But it shows that
' no tuning point fot state nnlz = 320 on iteration 1'
what's wrong with it? The files were also attached here.
Another question is can I use UPF US-PP? I see there are UPF US-PP on the web
page of PWscf.How can I change them between the UPF's and FORMATTED's?
Best wishes
Qianfan Zhang
Axel Kohlmeyer д:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, qfzhang wrote:
>
> QZ> Hi, dear all!
>
> dear qianfan zhang.
>
> QZ> I want to use USPP to generate the US-PP for oxygen in the
> QZ> calculation of oxi de. But the result is not good in the oxide(even
> QZ> I use very large supercell). I want to add l=2 channel in the O
>
> first of all, if you don\'t tell us, what you are trying to do and
> what your input looks like, i would strongly suspect that you are
> doing something wrong, since the oxygen ultrasofts generated by
> bernd meyer _do_ work well with a large number of systems, even
> oxides. so please provide some input that _proves_ that the
> pseudopotential is at fault. thanks.
>
> QZ> US-PP, because I find that the TM-PP I used bef ore includes the d
> QZ> channel. But I find it is impossible for me to generate such a
>
> you should be _very_ careful with that. pseudopotentials created
> with the \'haman\' style PP code that are in the cpmd pp library
> mostly contain a unbound, bogus d channel, which will either have
> little contribution (if used with LMAX=D LOC=P) or may give worse
> results (if used with LMAX=D, which implies LOC=D).
>
> QZ> US-PP.Is there anyone who know how to do that?
>
> adding another projector to existing USPP inputs is actually
> rather straightforward. just follow the instructions in the
> INPUT_XX files that ship with the code. the problem is to have
> it converged and bound. so you may have to slightly oxidize
> the atom and/or shift some fractional occupation to the d-state.
>
> QZ> Or who know some tricks to improve the quality of US-PP?
>
> before you put too much effort into optimizating the potential,
> you may be better off to stick with a reasonable norm-conserving
> pseudopotential. you avoid some of the overhead and \'only\' need
> some more cpus resources to distribute the work. but then again
> with ultra-softs, CPMD usually does not scale that far, so in case
> you have a large enough resource to run on, you may find NC-PPs
> about as efficient as US-PPs.
>
> cheers,
> axel.
>
>
>
> Best wishes
> Qianfan Zhang
> 2007-04-02
>
>
>
> --
> =======================================================================
> Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey at cmm.chem.upenn.edu http://www.cmm.upenn.edu
> Center for Molecular Modeling -- University of Pennsylvania
> Department of Chemistry, 231 S.34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323
> tel: 1-215-898-1582, fax: 1-215-573-6233, office-tel: 1-215-898-5425
> =======================================================================
> If you make something idiot-proof, the universe creates a better idiot.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: inp
Type: auto
Size: 1251 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://cpmd.org/pipermail/cpmd-list/attachments/20070402/5d89cf48/attachment.cc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: o_ae_s2p4.adat
Type: auto
Size: 677 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://cpmd.org/pipermail/cpmd-list/attachments/20070402/5d89cf48/attachment-0001.cc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: o_ps.adat
Type: auto
Size: 1159 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://cpmd.org/pipermail/cpmd-list/attachments/20070402/5d89cf48/attachment-0002.cc
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list