[CPMD-list] Help:about ag cutoff!
=?gb2312?B?wu3J0NLl?=
shyma at imr.ac.cn
Fri Aug 12 09:19:08 CEST 2005
Dear CPMD user:
I want to specify the suitable Ag cutoff energy and compute the single point total energy with different cutoff, I find it's difficult to converge with the criteria 1d-6 no matter what arithmetic I use. The Ag pesudopential file is Ag_SEMI_BLYP.psp under the pseudo-ext folder. The table show the results:
Ag_SEMI_BLYP.psp a=4.086 Å converge criteria 1d-6
* indate it does't converge when it reach the maxmum number step
£Å£Î£Å£Ò£Ç£Ù£¨A.U.£© (the number of computation step time/s)
CUTOFF
PCG MINIMIZE
DEFAULT
LANCZOS DIAGONALIZATION
STEEPEST DESCEND
ODIIS- LANCZOS
20
-148.65459706
(2521 129s)
-148.62911313*
( 234s)
-148.62911313*
( 234s)
-148.63166745*
-148.65454618*
( 238s)
30
-150.48724701
(902 73s)
-150.48724701
(2529 103s)
-150.48724701
(2529 103s)
-150.48724593*
-150.48694426*
( 411s)
40
-150.58035561
(2986 306)
-150.58035560
(5742 281s)
-150.58035560
(5742 281s)
-150.58009052*
-150.58008550*
( 495s)
50
-150.58300390
(2166 363)
-150.58272049
(5065 399s)
-150.58272049
(5065 399s)
-150.58272548*
-150.58300309*
£¨£©
60
-150.58499425
(2231 408)
-150.58471114
£¨5679 490s£©
-150.58471114
(5679 493s)
-150.58493776*
-150.58480024*
( 880s)
70
-150.58628042
(1958 449)
-150.58622285*
( 1126s)
-150.58622285*
( 1126s)
-150.58627646*
80
-150.58682224
(2060 627s)
-150.58682223
(1649 244s)
-150.58682223
(1649 245s)
-150.58681380*
90
-150.58693002
(6863 2500s)
-150.58665354*
( 1605s)
-150.58665354*
( 1615s)
-150.58665277*
100
-150.58697361
(4912 2619s)
-150.58671318*
( 1939s)
-150.58680340*
( 1934)
110
-150.58699188
(1647 707s)
-150.58699187
(5925 1248s)
-150.58699187
(5925 1253s)
-150.58672231
( 2092s)
120
-150.58701175
(2112 1342s)
-150.58672938*
( 3316s)
-150.58680001*
130
-150.58701943
(644 433s)
-150.58701942
(77 27s)
-150.58701942
(77 26s)
-150.58701942
(6653 )
140
-150.58702605
(3426 2472s)
-150.58702605
(4539 1588s)
-150.58700999*
150
-150.58703046
(1468 1187s)
-150.58674744
(5322 2050s)
-150.58684764*
( 3830s)
And you can find that the computation time is very short if I specify the cutoff 130 Ry, but it's difficult to converge in other casese! The following is my main form of input file:
&CPMD
OPTIMIZE WAVEFUNCTION
CONVERGENCE ORBITALS
1.0D-6
PRINT FORCES ON
PCG MINIMIZE
TIMESTEP
20
MIRROR
&END
&DFT
FUNCTIONAL BLYP
&END
&SYSTEM
SYMMETRY
FCC
SCALE
ANGSTROM
CELL
4.086 1.0 1.0 0 0 0
CUTOFF
20
&END
&ATOMS
*Ag_SEMI_BLYP.psp
LMAX=D
1
0.00 0.00 0.00
&END
I appreciate that if you find something wrong with the input file and it should be corrected or if you have some advice to improve the effiency of the computation!
Thank in advance and best wishes!
shyma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cpmd.org/pipermail/cpmd-list/attachments/20050812/d7912b37/attachment.html
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list