[CPMD-list] Problems optimizing monoclinic unit cell
Ewald Pauwels
ewald.pauwels at UGent.be
Tue Dec 7 11:20:04 CET 2004
Dear Axel,
First of all I would to thank you for your swift response.
>this is to be expected. if you use CELL VECTORS, cpmd does not even
>try to detect cell symmetry and thus assumes a triclinic cell (and
>cannot take advantage of the symmetry).
>
>
>
In retrospect, this is indeed quite logical. So, whatever the original
symmetry, using CELL VECTORS would result in a "triclinic" cell in the
CPMD output?
>as far as i understand it - please correct me anybody, if i am mistaken,
>i'd really like to be certain about this - you have give the cell dimensions
>for the _conventional_ cell (but only the atom positions for the primitive cell).
>i know at least one more code, that uses the exact same conventions, so
>i am pretty sure, that this is intentionally so.
>
>
Actually, I have given the cell dimensions for the _primitive_ unit cell
(which is monoclinic). This cell contains four glycine molecules, for
which I have specified all atom positions explicitly. So, I might have
misunderstood, but I don't think I have used a conventional cell in any way.
Sincerely,
Ewald.
--
Ewald Pauwels
Centre for Molecular Modelling
Laboratory of Theoretical Physics
Ghent University
Proeftuinstraat 86
B-9000 Gent
Belgium
ewald.pauwels at UGent.be
+32 9 264 65 76
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list