[CPMD-list] Parallelization on k-points

Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi
Sat Jul 5 20:44:15 CEST 2003


Dear Audrius,

> We have a new cluster here in Basel, and I began running big jobs of 
> Ag(111) surface. I noticed that each k-point is done in serial. Would it 
> make a difference to do each of, let's say, 8 different k-points on a 
> different node? Is it difficult to implement? Would there be any time 
> economy or not?

The k point parallellisation is/would be indeed _very_ efficient as
the k points are very independent. It wouldn't be too much of work, I
believe (I did it once in a couple of days, yet on an smaller code,
once one knows the code it probably wouldn't take even that long. One
important issue is of course I/O, whether to write the restart files
in parallel, only on a single node etc).

    Exhausted Greetings from again-sunny Zurich,

       apsi

-- 
-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
 Ari Paavo Seitsonen / Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
 Tel +41 1 635 44 97 / Fax +41 1 635 68 38 / GSM +41 79 719 09 35      
 Anschrift: Physikalisch Chemisches Institut (PCI), Universität Zürich (UniZh)
 Indirizzo: Winterthurerstraße 190, CH-8057 Zürich
 Address:   Schweiz / Svizzera / Suisse / Svizra / Switzerland



More information about the CPMD-list mailing list