[CPMD-list] CPMD and SMP
kresslists at kressworks.com
kresslists at kressworks.com
Tue Feb 11 19:32:08 CET 2003
Dear Alessandro,
Thanks for the quick response.
What kind of improvements were seen in the Linux/ Portland example?
Also, has anyone tried this with the Intel compilers?
Jim
At Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:52:48 +0100, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>Yes.
>
>OMP directives have been added to the performance-critical routines.
>The efficiency of the OMP parallelization depends on the wks,
>compiler and
>libraries available.
>
>Since the compiler flags to turn on the OMP parallelization are very
>much
>dependent on the architecture and compiler used,
>only the IBM xlf compiler settings for the SMP only or the mixed SMP-
>MPI
>have been added.
>
>The SMP version has however been tested on SGI wks (J. Hutter) and
>Linux
>Red-Hat + Portland compiler.
>
>Best Regards,
>
>
>Alessandro CURIONI, PhD
>Research Staff Member
>Computational Biochemistry and Material Science group
>IBM Research Division - Zurich Research Laboratory
>Saumerstrasse 4
>8003 Rueschlikon - Switzerland
>e-mail: cur at zurich.ibm.com
>www: www.zurich.ibm.com
>Tel: +41-1-7248633
>Fax: +41-1-7248958
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jim Kress"
>
> <kresslists at kress To: <cpmd-
>list at cpmd.org>
>
> works.com> cc:
>
> Sent by: Subject: [CPMD-list]
>CPMD and SMP
>
> cpmd-list-admin at c
>
> pmd.org
>
>
>
>
>
> 02/05/2003 05:23
>
> PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Is CPMD SMP enabled? Will it use both processors if two are present
>in a
>workstation?
>
>Thanks
>
>Jim Kress
>
>_______________________________________________
>CPMD-list mailing list
>CPMD-list at cpmd.org
>http://www.cpmd.org/mailman/listinfo/cpmd-list
>
>
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list