[CPMD-list] CPMD tests
Jim Arken
jim_arken at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 1 21:29:12 CET 2003
Dear Prof. Hutter,
Thanks again. This clears things up a lot.
Just one more point of confusion...
>
> This is not correct. The reference 86 and 87 are
> actual
> proofs.
>
It appeared to me that an assumption was made that
electrons oscillate about the ground state and
therefore that their motion can be described in terms
of Kohn-Sham eigenvalues. This was assumed a priori.
If this assumption is not correct then the proof
is invalid. Right ?
Regards,
Jim
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list