[CPMD-list] Convergence is still too bad !!
Du Aijun
aijun_du at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 3 16:42:34 CEST 2003
Dear all,
When I performed a geomertry optimization on methane(CH4) molecule using
Vanderbilt ultrasoft pseudopotential and PCG MINIMIZE, I found the maximum
gradient of wavefunction grows bigger at first serveral steps, but keep
constant later. The problems are as following:
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.281 ENERGY = -7.9000653
1 2.752E-02 4.714E-03 -7.897058 -7.897E+00 25.17
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.422 ENERGY = -7.9589492
2 2.887E-02 4.662E-03 -7.900065 -3.008E-03 25.24
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.107 ENERGY = -7.9773182
3 6.313E-02 3.395E-03 -7.958926 -5.886E-02 25.22
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.176E-02 ENERGY = -7.9760463
4 9.486E-02 2.432E-03 -7.977438 -1.851E-02 25.18
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.330E-03 ENERGY = -7.9757286
5 9.847E-02 2.356E-03 -7.976233 1.205E-03 25.21
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.618E-04 ENERGY = -7.9755948
6 9.922E-02 2.343E-03 -7.975730 5.031E-04 25.21
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.116E-04 ENERGY = -7.9755623
7 9.937E-02 2.340E-03 -7.975595 1.354E-04 25.14
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.217E-05 ENERGY = -7.9755550
8 9.940E-02 2.339E-03 -7.975562 3.244E-05 25.11
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.407E-06 ENERGY = -7.9755533
9 9.941E-02 2.339E-03 -7.975555 7.374E-06 25.26
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.764E-07 ENERGY = -7.9755530
10 9.941E-02 2.339E-03 -7.975553 1.623E-06 25.10
.................................................................
.................................................................
997 9.941E-02 2.339E-03 -7.975552 -8.882E-16 25.23
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.525-157 ENERGY = -7.9755518
998 9.941E-02 2.339E-03 -7.975552 8.882E-16 25.21
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.262-157 ENERGY = -7.9755518
999 9.941E-02 2.339E-03 -7.975552 -8.882E-16 25.15
LINE SEARCH : LAMBDA=.590-157 ENERGY = -7.9755518
1000 9.941E-02 2.339E-03 -7.975552 8.882E-16 25.17
================================================================
= END OF GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION =
================================================================
The following is my first time input file:
&CPMD
OPTIMIZE GEOMETRY
HESSIAN UNIT
BFGS
PCG MINIMIZE
CONVERGENCE
1.0D-4 5.0D-4
CENTER MOLECULE
MAXSTEP
1000
&END
&DFT
NEWCODE
FUNCTIONAL PBE
GC_CUTOFF
0.2E-07
&END
&SYSTEM
ANGSTROM
pOSSION SOLVER TUCKERMAN
SYMMETRY
0
CELL
13.0 1.0 1.0 0 0 0
CUTOFF
30.0
STATES
5
CHARGE
0.0
TESR
2
&END
&ATOMS
*006-C-gpbe--bm.uspp NEWF BINARY
LMAX=P
1
-4.3985 1.5414 0.0000
*001-H-gpbe--bm.uspp BINARY NEWF
LMAX=S
4
-3.3985 1.5414 0.0000
-4.7323 2.4840 0.0000
-4.7323 1.0701 0.8164
-4.7323 1.0701 -0.8164
&END
Then I made some changes on my input file according to the suggestion from
others:
Adding INITIALIZE WAVEFUNCTION RANDOM in the section of $CPMD..... $END!
Increasing GC-CUTOFF to 5.D-5. But problem still exists and the only
difference is that the gradient become a new constant!
I also changed the Convergence standard to 1.D-3 and 1.D-3 to pass several
Geometry steps first.Then I restart the calculation with 1.D-5 and 5.D-5.
But the same Problems still met! In addition, bad convergence were also
observed when using another Vanderbilt potential(pw91 not PBE). All the
uspps inputfile are from inputfile
http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/uspp/uspp-cur/Work/
When I use other pseudopotential in the PP_LIBRARY provide by www.cpmd.org,
such as BLYP. It is very fast to reach convergence.
Could anyone help me solve this problem? Any comments and suggestions would
be highly appreciated!
With regards,
A.J.Du
_________________________________________________________________
Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list