[CPMD-list] about the Lanczos method
Bako Imre
baki at chemres.hu
Mon Aug 26 11:51:12 CEST 2002
Dear All
I tried to optimize the cell parameter of Palladium using differenet
functional.
I used the following input
&CPMD
WAVEFUNCTION OPTIMIZATION
SPLINE POINTS
5000
nothing or the following two line
LANCZOS DIAGONALISATION
ANDERSON MIXING
0.2
&END
&DFT
FUNCTIONAL PBE
&END
&SYSTEM
SYMMETRY
2
CELL
7.062 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CUTOFF
36.
TESR
4 4 4
SCALED
POINT GROUP
AUTO
&END
&ATOMS
*46-PdPBE.pp KLEINMAN-BYLANDER
LMAX=D LOC=S
1
.00000 .00000 .00000
&END
I got the following results.
First case. ELECTRONIC GRADIENT:
MAX. COMPONENT = 0.42507E-05 NORM = 0.25111E-06
NUCLEAR GRADIENT:
MAX. COMPONENT = 0.00000E+00 NORM = 0.00000E+00
TOTAL INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC DENSITY
IN G-SPACE = 10.000000
IN R-SPACE = 10.000000
(K+E+L+N+X) TOTAL ENERGY = -28.47799365 A.U.
(K) KINETIC ENERGY = 27.90230418 A.U.
(E=A-S+R) ELECTROSTATIC ENERGY = -32.79364868 A.U.
(S) ESELF = 33.24518871 A.U.
(R) ESR = 0.00165652 A.U.
(L) LOCAL PSEUDOPOTENTIAL ENERGY = 14.97342034 A.U.
(N) N-L PSEUDOPOTENTIAL ENERGY = -33.27787919 A.U.
(X) EXCHANGE-CORRELATION ENERGY = -5.28219030 A.U.
GRADIENT CORRECTION ENERGY = -0.10149011 A.U.
Second case (Using lanczos method)
ELECTRONIC GRADIENT:
MAX. COMPONENT = 0.88452E-03 NORM = 0.86514E-03
NUCLEAR GRADIENT:
MAX. COMPONENT = 0.00000E+00 NORM = 0.00000E+00
TOTAL INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC DENSITY
IN G-SPACE = 10.000000
IN R-SPACE = 10.000000
(B+E+X-V) TOTAL ENERGY = -29.05367185 A.U.
(B) BAND ENERGY = -4.56088319 A.U.
(E=I-H-S+R) ELECTROSTATIC ENERGY = -25.98640781 A.U.
(S) ESELF = 33.24518871 A.U.
(R) ESR = 0.00380195 A.U.
(X) EXCHANGE-CORRELATION ENERGY = -4.95568472 A.U.
(V) EXCHANGE-CORRELATION POTEN. = -6.44930386 A.U.
GRADIENT CORRECTION ENERGY = -0.06196058 A.U.
This two results somehow very strange. Can you explain me why I see so
large difference between the two results.
Imre
Bakó Imre
MTA Kémiai Kutatóközpont, Kémiai Intézet
1525 Budapest Pf. 17
Telefon
More information about the CPMD-list
mailing list